Panel questions value of graduation exam

Members of a Senate panel on Wednesday joined a chorus of skeptics who question whether the state should spend millions of dollars on a proposed state graduation testing program for Pennsylvania high school students.

Senators who participated in a Senate Education Committee hearing expressed doubts that the tests proposed by the State Board of Education would live up to the promise of ensuring that all graduates would be prepared for college and careers after high school.

‘‘It seems we’re getting test-happy,’‘ said Sen. James Rhoades, R-Schuylkill, the committee’s chairman.

The board has proposed creating a battery of 10 final examinations covering math, science, English and social studies. By the time this year’s sixth-graders — the class of 2014 — reach high school, they would have to pass six exams to graduate.
Source Link


I don't get this...

I simply don’t understand why tests have become so anathema to supposed educators. I’ve heard all these “teaching to the test” arguments and they, in the end, fail the smell test.

Students need to learn actual facts. They need to learn empirical data. They need to be able to calculate and read and comprehend. And, they need to be able to prove they can do so. As in, pass a test.

Seeking a balance between rote facts and “know how to learn” is all well and good, but one does not obviate the other.

Pilt

Post new comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <img> <div class="pullquote">
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • You can use Textile markup to format text.

More information about formatting options

We’ve developed a participation policy to help guide the tone of discussion in our community. Please read it to learn more about participating in Keystone Politics.