I find Kanjorski’s tactics here a bit curious. He seems to be meeting Barletta’s possible challenge (I don’t believe he’s an announced candidate yet)on Lou’s turf: immigration. You would think Kanjorski would be trumpeting his record in Washington or bragging about “bringing home the bacon” or some other talking point. Couldn’t Kanjorski be construed as an endorsement of Barletta’s stance against illegal immigration? By essentially agreeing with Barletta, isn’t he handing Lou a huge feather to put in his possible electoral cap? Or is the issue, as I suspect, more about Kanjorski trying to get his union ducks in a row before Barletta attempts to court them next year? A healthy portion of Dems in the 11th (as in many other districts across Pennsylvania) are the much-talked about “Reagan Dems”, who might be tempted to cross party lines once again.