The problem with having a Randian true believer like Paul Ryan as your party’s budget dude is that he’s going to tend to overestimate how well eliminating most government functions is going to go over with real life Republican voters.
Don’t be surprised if, for the reasons John Sides lays out here, the Ryan budget turns out to be a flop with the Republican base:
Paul Ryan’s budget would cut a lot of government spending. It would cut entitlement spending. It would cut aid to the poor, transportation, education, veterans benefits, and scientific research. There have been plenty of responses to the budget, positive and negative. But only a couple that I’ve seen—Jon Bernstein’s and Stan Collender’s—anticipate this potential problem:
It might not prove that popular with Republican voters.
In a March 3-6 YouGov poll, respondents were asked whether they wanted to increase spending, decrease spending, or keep spending the same in 16 different policy areas. In only one case, foreign aid, did a majority (72%) of Americans want to cut spending. And some of the most costly programs—like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid—attracted some of the least opposition.